Skip to main content
Inspect Solutions

Case studies

What our reports do for the cases that matter.

Outcomes from real inspections, anonymized while client permissions land.

A note on these case studies.

Each is anonymized — the carrier or manufacturer name is withheld until they confirm public reference. Outcomes and methodology are real. We add named case studies as clients confirm permissions; if you’d like a reference call before that, ask through our team.

  • Insurance carrier

    A regional carrier reduced contested water-damage claim cycles after switching inspection vendors.

    Setting
    A top-N US homeowners carrier (anonymized) running a multi-state residential book.
    Problem
    Contested flooring claims kept reopening. The carrier's in-panel inspector roster varied in technical rigor by region; the insured's contractor produced rebuttals that the original report had not pre-empted, and the file went back to the adjuster's desk for a second cycle.
    Engagement
    The carrier moved all multi-state contested-flooring assignments to Inspect Solutions for a 12-month evaluation window. Reports were structured for subrogation review from the first paragraph — methodology disclosed, expert credential matched to the failure mode, photographic and measurement evidence preserved.

    Outcome

    • Report defensibility against contractor rebuttalNumber pending — Daniel to source
    • Average claim cycle reducedNumber pending — Daniel to source
    • Contested-claim resolution rateNumber pending — Daniel to source

  • Product manufacturer

    A flooring manufacturer used a third-party inspection to defend a warranty dispute.

    Setting
    A major flooring manufacturer (anonymized) responding to a single high-visibility consumer warranty claim.
    Problem
    The customer's contractor blamed the product for a visible failure and demanded full warranty replacement. The manufacturer's in-house warranty technician had already documented the file, but consumer counsel raised an independence question — an in-house memo would not survive denial review.
    Engagement
    Inspect Solutions deployed a CFI- and NWFA-certified inspector for an unbiased third-party assessment. The report identified the failure mode at the installation interface, not the product, with chain-of-custody photography and measurement evidence formatted for Legal review.

    Outcome

    • Cert-backed report identified installation as the root cause
    • Warranty denial sustained on first review (no appeal cycle)
    • Time to defensible reportNumber pending — Daniel to source

  • Insurance carrier (virtual)

    A virtual inspection cut response time on a claim in a remote market.

    Setting
    A national carrier (anonymized) with a contested claim in a state where their existing inspector roster had no local capacity.
    Problem
    The claim was time-sensitive — the insured was waiting on a coverage decision that hinged on the inspection — and dispatching an in-person inspector to the market would have added several days to the cycle.
    Engagement
    Inspect Solutions ran a virtual inspection through the 24/7 platform with the insured's contractor on-site as the camera-holder. Methodology mirrored the in-person protocol: structured walk, measurement capture, photographic evidence preservation, expert-credentialed sign-off.

    Outcome

    • Report delivered hours, not days, after assignmentNumber pending — Daniel to source
    • Coverage decision issued within the same business cycle
    • Cycle-time delta vs. in-person dispatchNumber pending — Daniel to source

What you can expect

The same shape, on every assignment.

Anonymized today, named tomorrow — the report mechanics that produce these outcomes do not change.

  • Defensible reports for subrogation and litigation.

    Methodology disclosed, expert credential matched to failure mode, language structured for panel-counsel and consumer-counsel review.

  • Response-time SLAs on every market we cover.

    In-person and virtual dispatch options, with explicit turnaround targets per service line. Specific numbers ship as the SLA dataset closes.Numbers pending — Daniel to source

  • Cert-backed signature on every report.

    NWFA, IICRC, CFI, NALFA, NADRA — the cert is matched to the failure mode, not generic engineering. Verifiable on the issuing body's roster.

  • Photographic and measurement evidence preserved.

    Chain-of-custody photography, dated and geo-tagged. Moisture, dimensional, and environmental measurements captured to the report's methodology section.

Become a named case study

Worked with us before? We'd love to talk.

If you've worked with Inspect Solutions and would consider a named case-study reference, we'd love to talk. The anonymization band above goes away the moment you do.

Get in touch

Open an assignment

See what an evidence-grade report looks like — or open an assignment of your own.

Two starting points. The sample reports show what you receive on every engagement; an assignment is the first step on a real file.

Open an inspection assignmentDownload sample reports